Suge Knight was arrested and charge with assault with a deadly weapon involving a firearm and also driving with a suspended license. This happened when an unidentified man told police Knight had pointed a gun at him, police later found Knight driving around the same area with a suspended license. Knight was arrested on the spot without incident. Knight's lawyer says he is 100% innocent and that the man that made this accusations is lying. Knight's lawyer says he was only driving in the area to meet with a potential client. Knight posted bail of $60,000 and was released from jail. Knight's lawyer says he should be cleared of all charges because Knight is not someone that would carry a gun on him. He did not do this and shouldn't be charged with the crime. Knight's lawyer says that the man who accused Knight should be the one that needs to be investigated.
We are all innocent until proven guilty, right? It seems as if the police might be looking at Knight's past and 'assuming' he is guilty because of how he was with Tupac when he was shot and killed and that murder has yet to be solved. I feel that Knight needs to be proven guilty before any allegations can be made/proved. They need to show the evidence that he was involved with the man who is accusing Knight of assault with a deadly weapon involving a firearm. Yes, Knight deserves his punishment for driving with a suspended license, he did do that, there's proof. Yet, if there's no proof of him pointing a gun at this man how can you know that he was really involved? This man could have made the whole story up just because he was angry with Knight for not doing what this man wanted. Or, Knight could have pointed the gun at him and evidence will be found and he will be served with the proper punishment. No one is above the law. Someone will be found guilty.
No comments:
Post a Comment